big pharma–the Serpent

“My anger … stems from a constant toxic burden that is contributing to the chronic disease epidemic,”  Unknown.jpeg-Dr. Neides of Cleveland writes.

Neides notes that there are more than 80,000 chemicals being used in the United States, with another 2,000 introduced every year.  In addition to vaccines, we are exposed to these via food, air pollution, personal care products, and even our clothing.  He then makes the non-controversial claim that toxic chemicals disrupt the functioning of normal bodily systems and can lead to diseases including cancer, autoimmune disease, heart disease, diabetes, and neurological diseases.

Although the link between toxic chemicals and neurological disease–including Parkinson’s, which Neides specifically mentioned–is well established, Neides’ inclusion of autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on the list is part of what drew the ire of the medical establishment.  But there is certainly reputable research suggesting a role of toxic chemicals in the development of both conditions.

Neides goes on to say that while the body has a “wonderful” capacity to clear out toxic chemicals, excessive exposure can overwhelm this system.  Because vaccines are one source through which we are exposed to toxins such as formaldehyde, aluminum, and sometimes mercury, Neides holds them partially culpable for the chronic disease epidemic.


Dr. Daniel Neides, medical director and chief operating officer of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, said Sunday that he “fully supports vaccination” and was trying to open a conversation about their safety, not question their use.

Through a hospital spokeswoman, Neides released this statement:  “I apologize and regret publishing a blog that has caused so much concern and confusion for the public and medical community.  I fully support vaccinations and my concern was meant to be positive around the safety of them.”

The hospital says the doctor’s words do not reflect the Clinic’s position.

The Clinic responded by doubling down on its disavowal of Neides’ column, saying that the health system is “fully committed to evidence-based medicine,” and promising to take disciplinary action against Neides.  Clinic officials have not yet determined what that action will be, according to a spokeswoman.

comments to above article:  

Brandy M Smith Jan 11, 2017

 Thank you Dr. Neides for opening dialogue on the safety of vaccine adjuvants.  Apparently some people can’t read very well, most likely caused by the sudden blindness from their fits of rage anytime vaccines are questioned.  As a mother of three I enjoyed your article and found it refreshing to the monotonous regurgitation of pharmaceutical industry jargon and cliché phrases so common by medical professionals.  We personally choose not to purchase vaccine products, and pray we are able to maintain our freedom to not be forced to purchase products we do not want, such as health insurance.  With fast approaching fascism, mandates, and regulations based on pharmaceutical industry funded “science” quickly eliminating our individual sovereignty, it is a concerning issue.  Vaccines mandates, and not just adjuvants should also be questioned by the public and medical communities.  Vaccines are touted as necessary and life-saving but at what cost? …

The Varicella vaccine is a great example of vaccine mandate abuse and government catering to pharmaceutical interest.  A government mandate for a disease with less than 100 persons/yr, mostly elderly, mortality rate?!  More than twice as many people are killed by cows a year than chicken pox before the vaccine, now there are massive outbreaks of shingles in our elderly citizens caused directly by not being exposed to younger persons with varicella.  But don’t worry, big pharma has shingles a and b shots conveniently already manufactured, packaged, and ready for your a__!  These scientists will always believe they can play God, and they will as always be greatly disappointed, at the cost of much harm and suffering.  This is a perfect example of the overreaching allopathic medical community attacking those who adhere to a more naturopathic modality. Shame on those at Cleveland clinic and elsewhere for attacking Dr. Neides for simply stating legitimate concerns, and calling for “disciplinary action”…for??  Dr. Neides you don’t deserve this type of alienation and harassment for simply expressing your professional and medical concerns

EoschneiderJan 11, 2017

Dr. Neides should not be disciplined for his opinion.  He has the privilege to speak as this is his American right.  He has started the conversation based upon his personal experience and what he observes as a physician.  As a former pro-vaccine mother, I can attest to the backlash of injustices one experiences for opposing the status quo.  Twenty-three years ago our baby was vaccinated with the hepatitis b vaccine at birth and suffered a life changing reaction.  He suffered subsequent injuries as I did not know, nor could I accept the fact that it was more hepatitis b vaccines plus scheduled vaccines that crippled him for life.  The evidence is in his injuries.  My twenty years of searching for the culprit ingredient turned up in every debunking by the status quo.  But my FOIA request gave me the answer.  It is phenylmethylsulfonyl flouride, a chemical used in the process of making recombinant DNA vaccines (Energix b, Guardasil).  Labelling law does not require this ingredient to be named because it is used in the “process”.  It is not supposed to be in the final product.  It would only be there if it binded with DNA protein contamination which the FDA allows in these vaccines.
 Big Pharma wields it’s bludgeoning sledge hammer on a free thinking, non-conformist.
Dave B Jan 10, 2017

 I hope you doctors and media people enjoy living in your fascist world.  As long as doctors are strangled from true research, this country will continue a slide into total dictatorship. When you stand in front of God, he will say, “I know ye not.”.
Mom23 Jan 9, 2017

 All drugs are tested against placebos before they are allowed onto the market.  EXCEPT vaccines.  There is NO double blind study comparing vaccines to a solution containing only saline.  ZERO.  Adjuvants are injected into both groups used for comparison (adjuvant group vs. virus plus adjuvant) and the ingredients ARE nasty.  Read a vaccine insert one day.  It’s pretty eye opening.  As soon as doctors are no longer shielded and TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for adverse reactions I will start listening.  For now I am disillusioned with all of this.  There is such as thing as TOO MUCH.  And 72 shots for children is TOO MUCH.  It’s making them sick.  BRAVO to this doctor for saying something–and stating the obvious.  Something is very wrong with this picture, even if in some cases vaccines are good.  Now it’s just about selling more more more and greed greed greed.  Meanwhile, our children’s health is worsening throughout the nation.  You cannot vaccinate your way to good health.  Quite the opposite is true, in fact.

If vaccines are so safe, why are the doctors and industry SHIELDED from any recourse when a child’s health is ruined?  Oh yeah, because there is RISK.

hylin2006    Jan 9, 2017                                 Caltech, MIT, Johns Hopkins, and numerous other research centers the past few years have proven immune activation causes Autism, both in prenatal and postnatal experiments? (see cytokines IL-6 and IL-17 repeatedly proven to cause autism via immune activation, and vaccines.   Hepatitis B, for example, creates extremely elevated levels of IL-6 months after exposure.  2015 Li et al).

The 2014 CDC whistleblower, Dr. Thompson, also stated for a fact he and other CDC authors found causal links to brain damage via vaccines and covered up their findings in multiple studies.   Not to mention Dr. Verstraeten and others at the CDC in 1999/2000 stated they found causal links to brain damage/neuro disorders from exposures to both Mercury and Aluminum.   Aluminum, which has dramatically increased with more vaccines introduced the past few decades.

Acknowledge the fact immune activation causes autism.   And acknowledge the fact Hannah Poling, along with thousands of other families, have received billions in injury compensation for vaccine-induced brain damage/autism.

BustedHalo@BK  BustedHalo@BK Jan 9, 2017
 You’re accusing us of committing a crime worthy of losing our children for wisely choosing to not vaccinate them because we love them.

Where’s any scientific justification that vaccines, combined as per any schedule, are safe and have reduced disease in a vaccinated population?  Any safety study comparing the vaxxed and unvaxxed, for say, the first 18 years of a child’s life?  Why does the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act make sure to protect the industry from any liability whatsoever? Taxpayers contribute to that pot.


A recent pilot study from Pennsylvania State and Yale University has revealed that there may be an association between inoculation and the onset of disorders such as anorexia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxiety disorders.”

The research, which was conducted using a database of private insurance medical claims, found that children who had recently been given the flu vaccine were significantly more likely to develop some type of mental disorder.  The researchers stated that getting the vaccine within the last year was “associated with incident diagnoses of AN, OCD, and an anxiety disorder.”

The risk association appeared to be highest in relation to anorexia nervosa. There was an 80 percent increase in the risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder in children who had been vaccinated within the three months prior to diagnosis.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s