12-5-13 The immense liability protection granted to U.S. vaccine manufacturers is particularly troubling given its pervasive influence and significant omnipresence in vaccine policymaking. U.S. government health officials in charge of promulgating vaccine policy are often in the same circle as those who profit financially from vaccine sales. With liberal grants of waivers to numerous and substantial conflict of interests, U.S. government health officials allow the approval of unsafe vaccines on the market. As a result, this law not only insulated U.S. vaccine manufacturers from liability, but it also created perverse incentives and paved the way for potentially more unsafe vaccines to flood the market. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2364071
Not content with distorting the data, the authorities are now indulging in financial manipulation in their efforts to increase the vaccination levels. Under the new OP contracts, effective from 1 April, doctors who achieve a 90 per cent take-up rate among parents qualify for an £1,800 bonus payment. Those managing just 70 per cent get £600. Anything under that percentage and the doctors get nothing. It is a nakedly coercive strategy, and already reports are reaching Rosemary Fox, founder of the Association of Parents of Vaccine Damaged Children, of OPs striking parents off their lists for refusing to allow their children to have the jabs.
‘Most parents are unable to resist the pressure and have allowed their children to be vaccinated,’ she says, ‘but they remain very unhappy about it.’ It is the pertussis or whooping cough vaccine that causes most concern. The limited debate that has taken place in the UK has centred on this jab and on the well-publicised instances of brain damage clearly associated with it. But a significant and, probably, growing minority of parents are questioning the whole vaccination premise….
But when the vaccine is introduced directly into the circulation, by contrast, it is given free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues without any obvious way of getting rid of it. Having gained access, elements of the vaccine can stay for prolonged periods, perhaps permanently, by incorporating themselves within the genetic material of the cells. This constant presence and the body’s repeated but hopeless attempts to expunge the foreign or, by now, quasi-foreign presence, can lead to a systematic weakening of the immune system as a whole and, thus, a greater susceptibility to all manner of ailments.
And so, far from providing protection against acute disease, vaccination can be said to drive the disease itself deeper into the body’s interior and cause that body to harbour the disease chronically.
Among the chronic maladies associated with latent, persisting viruses, says Moskowitz, are warts, shingles, herpes, Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease, AIDS and benign and malignant tumours. He also suggests a link between whooping cough vaccine and leukaemia — an association he supports with case histories from his own practice and with other clinical data. All this is apart from evidence of short-term, less serious side-effects….
American medical historian Harris Coulter has caused an even bigger stink with his vaccine investigation. In his new volume, Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality, he claims:
‘A large proportion of the millions of US children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia and other shoots and branches of the hydra-headed entity called “developmental disabilities” owe their disorders to one or another of the vaccines against childhood diseases.’
The problem can be traced, he says, to the vaccines’ damaging effect on the myelination process of the child’s developing nervous system — myelin being the greasy substance that forms an insulating sheath around nerve fibres. This damage causes an allergic encephalitis (inflammation or infection of the brain) leading to the widespread consequences he has identified.
With vaccine proponents denying immediate, palpable side effects, says Coulter, it is little wonder that wholehearted disinterest is shown in the possibility of long-term damage.
Rosemary Fox, of the Association of Parents of Vaccine Damaged Children, believes that new vaccines enter the public domain not for health reasons but p rimarily because of the drug companies’ ability to dream up profitable new products. http://whale.to/m/tyler.html
For, beloved ones, you cannot comprehend the cross of this addiction and the double-cross when there are those in positions of professions who advocate more and more uses of drugs, creating more and greater damage for the relieving of the problem that has already been created by drugs. -Kuan Yin: 10-6-1977 at Pasadena; see https://books.google.com/books?id=rP9xljL5NrkC&pg=PA129&lpg=PA129&dq=clare+prophet+kuan+yin+doublecross&source=bl&ots=HOF9VaphxH&sig=U8TZdwnOW8qhkoc5QUO0u7wsbx0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjM69HAqv7NAhUN12MKHX8mDbsQ6AEILTAD#v=onepage&q=clare%20prophet%20kuan%20yin%20doublecross&f=false
-Kuan Yin by Ruth Hawkins